Publications
Summer 2001 Newsletter
Sacramento Urges Innovation In Public Facilities Sec. Adams
Sees Direct Link To Better Schools
School
facilities consist of more than simply four walls and a roof.
The building massing, the size of windows and the orientation
of the classrooms all have measurable effects on the students
in terms of scholastic achievement and conceptual retention. At
the urging of Secretary of State and Consumer Affairs Aileen Adams
and her team of experts, the legislature is finally realizing
the link between education and school facilities. NSBN is proud
to present this interview with State Secreatry of State and Consumer
Affairs Aileen Adams and Arnold Sowell, Jr.
Sec. Adams, could you give our readers a synopsis of the
policy dialogue taking place within the State Consumer Services
Agency regarding the need for and the planning of sustainable
new public facilities?
Aileen Adams
State Consumer Services Agency
We must begin to look at what a building costs over its lifetime
and include such items as energy savings and increased employee
production to that equation. This is especially true given the
fact that upfront costs are a mere 2-percent of the total cost
of a building, while operation and maintenance costs equal roughly
6-percent and personnel costs are about 92-percent. But, in order
to implement an approach which focuses upon life cycle costing,
we have to change the current culture. And that's what we're in
the process of trying to do.
What's compelling the State to take on the challenge of
implementing sustainable development?
Aileen Adams
First, it saves taxpayers money.
Second, it creates buildings that are healthier, making them
more productive.
Third, the buildings are vastly more energy efficient, which
is of particular importance during our energy crisis.
And fourth, sustainable development greatly benefits the environment
because it ensures use of recycled materials, which diverts tremendous
amounts of materials from landfills.
And what are the political challenges at the state level
when you try to make a cultural change within the public institutions
responsible for financing, designing and building new state facilities?
Aileen Adams
Cultural change really begins with education and altering the
historic view of cost. It's about making every agency involved
in the building process--including the Legislature and the Department
of Finance--understand that sustainability provides a more productive
environment for employees and is cost effective over a period
of years-- that ultimately saves taxpayer dollars.
Often public facilities projects are challenged for not being
on-time or on-budget and public sector staff are thus typically
risk-averse to experimenting with building forms that are new.
Have you found any resistance within state government? If so,
how have you overcome whatever hesitation there's been to trying
something that hasn't been done before in the public sector?
Aileen Adams
We overcame a lot of distrust among agencies during a site visit
to San Diego where we toured two identically constructed buildings
where one had been retrofitted with energy efficiency and sustainability
measures and the other had not. The advantages of the retrofitted
building in terms of cost savings, energy efficiency and productive
work environment were apparent to everyone. And after that tour,
it became very clear that sustainability was not difficult and
made sense on many different levels.
The DGS staff saw first hand how they could benefit from the
expertise of the environmental and health departments in government.
A true partnership began to form that day and has been strengthened
ever since. Now we have a team approach in the way we design and
construct buildings. I give DGS a lot of credit because that was
a big change for them.
Mr. Sowell, the East End Project in Sacramento and the
Downtown L.A. Caltrans Headquarters building are examples of the
evolving design and construction framework we've been talking
about. Will the state be able to use these projects as models
for other new state buildings, including new school facilities?
Arnold Sowell, Jr.
State Consumer Services Agency
The great thing on the school construction front is that there
is a significant effort underway between state agencies, utilities,
non-profit organizations and others called The Collaborative for
High Performance Schools (CHPS). They are using these sustainable
building practices, technologies, and implementation procedures
as a foundation for the development of high performance schools.
A practical question. The public sector typically takes on a project
like this, phases it out and budgets for it in a manner often
inconsistent with the cost of a building system over its lifecycle.
This isn't the best way for a project to arise, it's not the way
it should be budgeted, and it's not the way it should be managed.
How then, do you overcome past practice? How do you introduce
the notion that a new construction is a holistic process that
will have a lifecycle of 20, 30, 40 years?
Aileen Adams
We're beginning that process right now, and the key is training
for every state agency involved in the building process. We should
also look to the private sector, which has recognized that sustainable
building makes sense and learn from their experiences. There are
many private sector companies that are finding that this type
of construction is saving money and working well for their employees.
We need to integrate these experiences into the state's capital
outlay process.
It's harder than one might think to overcome these age-old paradigms
of budgeting and development. But in the end, regardless of the
difficulty, sustainability simply makes sense and we've taken
a giant step toward its implementation through the Governor's
Executive Order and the work of the task force. Their recommendations
will be released in a few weeks.
All of us must remember that when we build, we build forever.
As Winston Churchill once said, "We shape our buildings and
then they shape us."
Mr. Sowell, what are your thoughts re: the challenges,
obstacles and hesitations standing in the way of this new paradigm
being embraced by public facilities personnel at the state, regional
and local levels? From your experience what are the argumentative
and logistical obstacles that are keeping sustainability from
truly being embraced?
Arnold Sowell, Jr.
As Secretary Adams mentioned, right now the thinking around most
fiscal operations is that you look at building construction from
a "first cost" standpoint and separate out operations
and maintenance costs over the lifecycle of the building. And
despite the widespread understanding that resource efficient buildings
will see savings over their lifetime, the fiscal types only notice
or recognize the increased up-front allocation.
The other critical component is intrinsic to the actual project
development process--you need to look at the building as a system,
not merely an amalgam of separate subcomponents. Building systems
are inextricably intertwined. An integrated design approach is
what the current state capitol outlay program needs to incorporate
into its project development process. Such a process allows architects,
engineers, and others to spend time developing sustainable building
applications. For instance, improved lighting means less heat
generation and therefore, the buildings mechanical and electrical
systems can possibly be scaled down. You need the right folks
in the room to make these types of decisions.
Lastly, Mr. Sowell, do you see sustainable building practices
being integrated into the language of the next state school bond,
park bond, or library bond?
Arnold Sowell, Jr.
I would hope so and here's one of the reasons why. Not too long
ago a study was commissioned by Pacific Gas & Electric and
conducted by the Herschong Mahone Group revolving around "daylighting."
Daylighting is a technique of incorporating as much natural light
as possible into the building design and is an integral feature
of any sustainable building project.
This study found that students in classrooms with additional
windows increased performance on math tests by 20-percent and
by 26-percent on reading tests, as compared to those with less
daylighting. So these sustainability guidelines are not merely
motivated by fiscal sensibility but to directly enhance the classroom
performance and learning atmosphere for students.
This type of empirical evidence should assist decision makers
in concluding that sustainable building practices should be incorporated
into bond measures. And my hope would be that the next school
of library bond will follow the lead of the recent park bond,
which included language on the use of recycled content materials
in the various park projects.
|