Publications
Summer 2001 Newsletter
Leveraged Strategies Key To Combating Staggering School Facility
Needs
The
need is staggering and the cost increasing exponentially each
day we do not implement a strategy for curbing the rampantly growing
need for school facilities within the state of California. To
compound matters we are using an old paradigm for school construction
which results in a system of crowded schools and under-utilized
facilities which cannot fulfill our children's need for seats,
let alone educational advancement. In this recently published
article for the Coro Leadership Review, NSBN Chairman,
David Abel, writes about the current and growing need
for a comprehensive plan to expand our school facilities through
joint use with libraries, parks, etc. and cites the growing number
of cases where it has been successful in neighborhoods all around
the state.
We are building over $15 billion worth of schools nationally each
year and we will see spending continue to rise as enrollment increases
by 1.6 million students in the next eight years. The nation's
largest teacher's union states that public school systems will
need to spend $322 billion to modernize, accommodate enrollment
growth, and equip students with educational technology. The Los
Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is 85,000 seats short
today and will be 200,000 short within a decade.
The Problem
Most new schools in California are dinosaurs the day they open.
Routinely, they are stand-alone structures constructed on empty
sites surrounded by chain link fences, planned to operate only
seven or eight hours a day. They are too often built to accommodate
up to 4,000 or 5,000 children. In contrast, most studies say children
need the more intimate learning settings of smaller schools in
which they can be known individually. Finally, new schools are
being thrown up with little if any thought to how they could become
true community centers for twelve or eighteen hour daily use.
Too often, they are constructed on the fringe, accessible only
by car trips or long rides in yellow buses—the very antithesis
of smart growth principles of compact, walkable communities.
A Common Vision
We stand at an enormous precipice in our efforts to increase
the quantity and quality of school facilities in the State of
California. Crossing this canyon will involve a complete rethinking
of our approach to facility construction. For too long the California
prototype for new schools has been based on agricultural land
considerations. The urbanization of California, however, has shifted
the emphasis away from orange groves and green fields to urban
infill. In the need for a new paradigm lies the crux of the New
Schools-Better Neighborhoods (NSBN) proposal and the future of
school facilities and neighborhood revitalization in California.
We learn, work, and live in a society of disjointed policy decision-making
where oftentimes one public agency does not know what another
is mandating. This dysfunctional relationship between the major
players in our government agencies is at the root of our current
dilemma in school construction. We have a dearth of adequate schools,
a lack of sufficient libraries, increasing demand for accessible
after school programs and healthcare, and a scarcity of useable
and functional neighborhood open space.
To complicate matters, California will have a 37 percent increase
in population by 2020. Yet these challenges go largely unmet because
of state and local regulations which create disincentives for
comprehensive planning, frustrate political will, and devalue
instructional and neighborhood input into facilities decisions.
As we enter a new millennium, we have an opportunity to convince
those in state and local leadership positions to break out of
the existing mindset.
A new paradigm is emerging in California. This new paradigm would
conceive of schools as centers of neighborhoods and communities
as centers of learning. The concept is simple: school districts
must move away from large, isolated schools, and look to partner
with neighborhoods to build smaller, more intimate campuses in
close proximity to parks, libraries, and other facilities like
healthcare clinics that offer joint-use possibilities. Gymnasiums
and play fields ought to double as community parks and recreation
centers; auditoriums ought to serve as community theaters; libraries,
family health centers, and other community services ought to be
integrated into the existing school framework and contribute to
a thriving neighborhood.
The advantages of such a proposal are many. For example, parents
benefit from the playing space for children and the community
benefits from more facilities in which to come together. This
is the NSBN vision. One need only look at a handful of projects
already underway throughout the state to see that the possibility
for success is achievable.
Cahuenga Elementary School
Los Angeles, California
The site originally selected for a new Cahuenga Elementary School
lies in one of the most overcrowded areas in the LAUSD. The original
LAUSD process for designing Cahuenga Elementary proceeded exactly
as outlined by the District's Site Acquisition Flow Chart and
ultimately lead to the unpopular recommendation of a 4.75 acre
site that currently houses twenty-one single-family homes and
an eight unit apartment building. In reaction, at the 1999 NSBN
Getty Symposium, the residents of the Beverly-Kingsley Neighborhood
Association kicked off an intense nine month community-wide effort.
They proposed alternatives that would save the targeted neighborhood
and instead redirect the construction to three smaller sites located
close to the heaviest concentration of students and the community's
most blighted properties. While LAUSD still is awkward partners
with such community-spirited efforts, the promise of neighborhood-
school partnerships is real.
Camino Nuevo Charter Academy
Los Angeles, California
In collaboration with community leaders and organizations, Pueblo
Nuevo proposed and subsequently constructed the Camino Nuevo Charter
Academy, a 240 student charter school. The design includes the
adaptive reuse of an existing shopping center in MacArthur Park.
Even more ingenious, the project converts the already existing
structure of the shopping center into an educational facility,
with costs estimated at 1/5 of the price of projects like the
Cahuenga Elementary School. This provides an opportunity to house
students in an intimate setting without disrupting existing residential
neighborhoods and current economic drivers.
Hayward Unified Master Plan
Hayward, California
Another innovative project is the recently completed educational
facilities master plan for the Hayward Unified School District.
The City of Hayward, California has a population of approximately
112,000 encompassing more than eighty-eight different ethnic groups.
Because of this diversity, the school district teaches in forty-three
different languages. However, instead of treating this as an impediment
to educational attainment, Hayward has used it as a vehicle for
integrating the community into the school fabric. Over the course
of eighteen months in a community-based planning process, one
hundred parents, students, educators, and other stakeholders came
together to design a fine arts multi-cultural center used not
only as an educational facility but also a tourist attraction
for the Bay Area.
These concepts help to solve the current school debacle and also
begin to answer how California will cope with the enormous influx
of people that will live in this state by 2020. Instead of consuming
tremendous quantities of land and encouraging sprawling development
and the destruction of the hinterlands, these community schools
help to focus growth around smart principles. They have begun
to lessen dependence on cars by placing necessary facilities within
communities, in turn lessening congestion, curtailing air pollution,
and preserving dwindling open space.
In order to accomplish these goals, we must not only speak to
our representatives in government but also involve the entire
populace. For too long groups around the state have focused on
Sacramento as the only vehicle for change. This must end! We must
incorporate the very people who will live in these neighborhoods,
give them a voice in decision-making, and explain what these comprehensive
alternatives are. We must urge council members, supervisors, department
heads, and government representatives to open the gates of our
underutilized schools and encourage the community to use them
not merely from 8 A.M. to 3:30 P.M. Monday through Friday, but
rather all day, everyday of the week.
We live in a society that speaks of community representation,
grassroots organizing, and local control. Now is the time to collaboratively
invest voter approved school, park, and library bond funds into
urban revitalization efforts to produce not only new schools but
better neighborhoods. Now is the time to reform and institutionalize
our thinking and practices regarding the way we revitalize our
communities. Applying New Schools-Better Neighborhoods principles
is a way to start.
|